Wednesday, May 11, 2011

the new york times front page

the new york times front page. The Pearl Harbor of the 21st
  • The Pearl Harbor of the 21st



  • RalfTheDog
    Apr 7, 12:07 PM
    Apple is anticompetitive and should be shut down. By producing products customers want when others in the industry can't, they are forcing the competition out of business.

    If Apple is not shut down, they should be forced to only sell the products designed by RIM and Google, while Google and Rim can build any Apple product they want. Apple also needs to be forced to fire their QC department. While they are at it, they might want to replace their marketing department with a bunch of rabid chimps. They might also be forced to purchase advertising for RIM.

    Apples cash reserves also give them an unfair advantage. Perhaps they should give half their money to RIM. Perhaps Apple should design and build the products and sell them, however, RIM and Google would get the money.





    the new york times front page. old new york times front page.
  • old new york times front page.



  • usptact
    Apr 18, 03:25 PM
    No for patents! They are meant only for dominant and rich get even more rich and influential.





    the new york times front page. the New York Times).
  • the New York Times).



  • 2IS
    Apr 20, 01:23 PM
    I'm glad they are sticking with the current design as I think the iP4 is by far the best looking phone on the market. That said, I'll be skipping iP5 as it's not much of an upgrade from my iP4. The faster processor is nice, but I'm content with the speed of the iP4 and I'm pretty sure IOS5 will be supported. I just don't want to take the chance of not being eligible for an upgrade when the MAJOR iphone update comes.





    the new york times front page. the New York Times#39;s (NYT)
  • the New York Times#39;s (NYT)



  • Moyank24
    May 4, 04:00 PM
    According to the OP, we should be setting up our turns like this:

    The team can use the "Explore" action to discover, and disarm, the trap harmlessly. This means the team will be advised to manipulate their turns so that they enter, AND explore, a room before their turn ends.


    Also, I'm with Aggie. We shouldn't split up until we are more powerful.





    the new york times front page. the fake New York Times!
  • the fake New York Times!



  • paradox00
    May 4, 03:42 PM
    what makes you think that you can copy it to a USB drive or disc? I have disc for Tiger, Leopard, and Snow Leopard. None of those disc can be copied, some of them can only be used on their original machine (or the exact model). the past 3 OSes can't be copied, and so far there's nothing to suggest we can just make backup copies of Lion.

    Oh really? (http://www.walterjessen.com/make-a-bootable-backup-snow-leopard-install-disc/)

    As an aside: The disks that only work with one computer are the ones that ship with new macs. No upgrade* disks sold in the Apple Store have that restriction, and there's no reason to assume the mac app store would be any different.

    *The "upgrade" disks are full installs, but since the only legal way to install OSX is to install it on a mac that already came with a version of OSX, all standalone disks are technically upgrades.





    the new york times front page. “The New York Times Co.
  • “The New York Times Co.



  • RebelScum
    Apr 20, 08:55 AM
    Right or wrong the glass iphone will be forever associated with Antennagate.

    Yeah that whole debacle really brought the company to its knees. :rolleyes:





    the new york times front page. new york times front page
  • new york times front page



  • inkswamp
    Nov 5, 03:31 PM
    I'm actually not too thrilled to see this. Mac OS X does NOT need virus protection. Companies like this make OS X seem like it's prone to viruses.

    Blah blah blah. Lack of AV software makes Macs very unattractive to business settings.

    It installs various components into your system, so no, not until Apple modifies their guidelines.

    Seeing how many things it does install and the size of the download, I wouldn't install this on any computer. Looks like FUDware to me.

    One of the barriers to integrating Macs into corporate and business environments is the lack of anti-virus tools. Yeah, you can dismiss this as FUD (and maybe there's some truth to that) but the fact remains--someday, one way or another, there will be a Mac OS X virus. I defy you to find one IT dept. in the country that wants to be caught off-guard by that. If you're going to have Macs in a business environment, the IT staff needs to know that they're protected in the event of an OS X virus outbreak. Whether any OS X viruses exist now or not and whether AV companies are trying to sell products with FUD is irrelevant in that context.

    Those of you who want to see wider adoption of Macs in business environments ought to be happy to see this kind of thing showing up, regardless of whether you personally need it or not.





    the new york times front page. Front page, New York Times,
  • Front page, New York Times,



  • Wolfpup
    Nov 5, 08:26 AM
    Sophos provides solutions mainly for large corporations. Its as legitimate as it can get. Whats good about is the small foot print their software takes. So its all business and no nonsense "turbo meters" etc. like with Intego Virus Barrier. Honestly I have no idea why they are giving away Home version for free. The business solutions are expensive. Then again if you really want to sell to corporations it makes sense to give people free home versions to gain presence and goodwill. After all those free Home version using people work in corporations...

    From this comment I can tell you have had absolute NO EXPERIENCE with the product.

    We have had it in our company for 10 years and it's absolutely non-intrusive and hassle free.

    Please don't generate noise if you don't have any relevant experience.

    Patrick

    Nice! Thanks for the info...so I take it this is better than Symantec's product? I used to like their corporate product for Windows, but it got AWFUL as of version 11, so I'm hesitant to install the OS X version (we've got a site license) so it's nice to have an alternative finally!





    the new york times front page. front page of the New York
  • front page of the New York



  • *LTD*
    Apr 5, 07:13 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8G4)

    Who the hell at Toyota thought this was a good idea?? It was remarkably unprofessional of them to begin with.

    You don't establish business relationships by breaking the other's EULA. This is frankly, shocking from a company such as Toyota.





    the new york times front page. By most counts, New York Times
  • By most counts, New York Times



  • JAT
    Apr 20, 12:02 PM
    You're just screwing with me, right? Because this has nothing to do with what I actually wrote.
    Yes, the US is literally the entire world. There are no other countries, let alone other countries with 12-month contracts. Why, Sir, that would be inconceivable!
    I think it does. Obviously, so did others.





    the new york times front page. The New York Times front page
  • The New York Times front page



  • Shasterball
    Apr 26, 02:18 PM
    iOS needs to evolve. It is old and stale...

    How terrible is the notification system? And it's been around for almost 4 years!





    the new york times front page. kerry 2004 front page.jpg
  • kerry 2004 front page.jpg



  • iliketyla
    Mar 29, 02:50 PM
    Foxconn is Taiwanese.

    The plant with mass rates of suicide is in China.





    the new york times front page. across the bottom of the front page, below the news articles and a brief summary of some articles in the paper. In the past, The New York Times has
  • across the bottom of the front page, below the news articles and a brief summary of some articles in the paper. In the past, The New York Times has



  • iZac
    Mar 28, 11:14 AM
    Capacity bump now, full update September(ish)?





    the new york times front page. Times Reader 2.0 Front Page
  • Times Reader 2.0 Front Page



  • mazola
    Sep 11, 11:19 AM
    Isn't it about time they update their .Mac offerings too?





    the new york times front page. Will the New York Times dare
  • Will the New York Times dare



  • marksman
    Mar 29, 04:40 PM
    I agree that the convergence of data cap limits by commodity access providers and the evolving cloud of data are directly at odds, but ultimately the way around that will come from large grid wifi solution. Google has already started trying to do this.. and they and others will eventually make it happen the less available the current home and wiress providers are... You will be able to get wireless access in most places for free and use as much data as you want... The way the current bandwidth providers are going, it is absolutely going to happen.

    They are going to essentially create their own demise. Yes bandwidth usage is going up, but the providers need to figure out how to keep up and stay with the changing times. Instead they are going in the opposite direction. These concerns about having all your data in the cloud and then streaming it is legitimate given current and future caps by providers... Like I said though, ultimately it will be blown off by a consortium of the content providers who want people to access them as much as possible. The commodity providers either will have to catch up or be cut out.





    the new york times front page. The front page of The New York
  • The front page of The New York



  • jholzner
    Aug 11, 02:00 PM
    No, my point is that I think Apple will continue to do what it's always done, and that those arguing that they'll suddenly treat product announcements differently just because their chips are now supplied by Intel are only speculating.


    Well, they released the Macbook with nothing more than a press release and an update to their site. This product had a complete make over and looks almost nothing like the iBook it replaced. Why no special event? I think things WILL be changing due to the Intel transition. They will have to treat announcements differently. No more will there be a year between speed increases etc.





    the new york times front page. …the New York Times endorsed
  • …the New York Times endorsed



  • dj2mc
    Nov 26, 01:12 PM
    To lay down some feedback of my own, I have used Sophos for a while and I am very pleased with it. I had Clam XAV for the longest time, and to be honest I never felt very safe w/ it because it never had the image of it was even scanning legibly, sometimes it would pop up with scan errors, corrupt updates, etc. The list goes on... Sophos is a prime example of an AV that has characteristics that others are missing. It's stable, fast, reliable and ultimately gives you the best protection because it's always scanning, and always searching the file you open each time. What more can you want?
    So, I tip my hat off to Sophos





    the new york times front page. new york times soccer headline
  • new york times soccer headline



  • mikejfrd
    Mar 27, 10:09 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Well my source tells me that whenever the next generation iPhone comes out ATT will have exclusive rights to it for a few months before verizon. How/why I have no idea, I'm just relaying info.





    the new york times front page. the New York Times front
  • the New York Times front



  • ChazUK
    Mar 29, 01:45 PM
    What I see is Amazon being explicit here in that they can retain, use and disclose your data in any way they see fit. Period.

    Do you see this differently?

    Looking at what you've said there makes sense and I think I see it the same as you (it certainly looks like Amazon will have more "right" to access your data for less specific reasons).

    Perhaps it's a bad judge of character but I do see Amazon along with Apple as top tier companies when it comes to privacy concerns so my concerns are dampened by their good reputations. :)

    Hopefully some rogue element in Amazon doesn't abuse the levels of access they have.





    thejadedmonkey
    May 6, 03:00 AM
    There's no reason why a Macbook Air couldn't use an ARM CPU for multi-day battery life. Heck, force developers to pay a fee to compile for ARM (it's already in place by charging for xcode) and you've basically forced every user to re-buy every app they use, for ARM... that's definitely Apple's MO, and I can definitely believe it.





    rxse7en
    Aug 11, 10:53 AM
    Could Apple technically squeeze a Xeon proc into the MBP?





    dwman
    May 7, 12:45 PM
    This would potentially mean that "Find my iPhone" would be free as well. Maybe?





    rhsgolfer33
    Apr 15, 08:35 PM
    I guess you just can't relate to us creative types.

    What are you, an accountant?

    Next time, I'll try to say in numbers so you can understand.

    Hey, come on, I resent that, I'm a tax accountant. :p

    But then again, judging by GE, we're a pretty creative bunch ourselves. ;)





    Hastings101
    Apr 26, 02:12 PM
    Who cares? I thought this was macrumors not android news...

    I also thought it was Macrumors and not iPhonerumors :)

    Macrumors is just the name of the site, whatever "rumors" get posted just have to somehow relate to Apple I guess.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment